A Lawyer Talks

By Joshua Rozenberg

Listen to a podcast, please open Podcast Republic app. Available on Google Play Store and Apple App Store.


Category: News Commentary

Open in Apple Podcasts


Open RSS feed


Open Website


Rate for this podcast

Subscribers: 5
Reviews: 0
Episodes: 83

Description

Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon) is Britain's most experienced commentator on the law. This new podcast complements the daily updates he publishes on A Lawyer Writes.

rozenberg.substack.com

Episode Date
Bacon at Gray’s
May 21, 2026
AI: risks and rewards
May 18, 2026
Judges or juries?
May 15, 2026
Law in crisis
Apr 29, 2026
What’s in a pronoun?
Apr 24, 2026
One Man, Two Guvnors
Apr 13, 2026
A president retires
Mar 30, 2026
Suspending judgement
Mar 20, 2026
Justice for all
Mar 12, 2026
Life and death
Mar 05, 2026
State immunities
Feb 17, 2026
Jury reforms in weeks
Feb 06, 2026
Can lawyers trust AI?
Jan 29, 2026
Phone hacking
Jan 19, 2026
Principled and pragmatic
Jan 13, 2026
Gibraltar rocked
Jan 05, 2026
Not just a farmer’s wife
Dec 22, 2025
Shambolic
Dec 15, 2025
Equality before the law
Dec 09, 2025
Jury’s back
Dec 05, 2025
Was US attack a war crime?
Dec 04, 2025
Fortitude
Nov 27, 2025
Paradoxes of property
Nov 25, 2025
Tyranny and anarchy
Nov 20, 2025
The limits of AI
Nov 12, 2025
Judging human rights
Nov 03, 2025
Justice for all?
Oct 30, 2025
Spy case unravels
Oct 23, 2025
Traducing the judges
Oct 17, 2025
Consumer protection?
Oct 01, 2025
Don’t go, says ex-judge
Sep 25, 2025
Patently obvious
Sep 15, 2025
Reform begins at home
Sep 11, 2025
Access to justice
Sep 01, 2025
Egging on a pre-nup
Aug 04, 2025
Epstein’s toxic legacy
Jul 28, 2025
Trying rape fairly
Jul 22, 2025
Leveson reports
Jul 09, 2025
Family law: the future
Jul 04, 2025
Revisiting the refugee convention
Jun 27, 2025
Cyber attacks
Jun 19, 2025
A common heritage
Jun 12, 2025
Unlocking the door
Jun 05, 2025
Lord Wolfson replies...
Jun 04, 2025
Chinook families seek answers
May 28, 2025
Merricks wins £200m
May 21, 2025
Curtailing jury trial
May 15, 2025
Judicial diplomacy
May 14, 2025
Fraudsters beware
Apr 24, 2025
Proudman vindicated
Apr 22, 2025
Shutting out kleptocrats
Apr 02, 2025
Guidelines explained
Mar 31, 2025
Was it fraud?
Mar 24, 2025
Real, not artificial
Mar 19, 2025
Yet more regulation?
Mar 06, 2025
Testing injustices
Feb 27, 2025
Watching the watchers
Feb 18, 2025
Judging the judges
Feb 14, 2025
Judge ‘deeply upset’
Feb 03, 2025
From bench to benches
Jan 28, 2025
A changing climate
Jan 24, 2025
‘Why I resigned’
Jan 15, 2025
Changing the bar’s culture
Jan 09, 2025
AI can turn dark
Dec 13, 2024
What would Chalk do?
Dec 05, 2024
Deepfakes under fire
Dec 03, 2024
Failing to prevent fraud
Nov 29, 2024
Get Carman
Nov 21, 2024
What can former judges do?
Nov 13, 2024
Justice for Jenrick
Nov 06, 2024
Supporting the bereaved
Oct 14, 2024
Living above the cells
Sep 16, 2024
Ministry of injustice
Jul 15, 2024
Harry Dunn’s legacy
Jun 24, 2024
A lawyer talks
Jun 20, 2024
Creativity and conservatism
May 30, 2024
Leaving the ECHR is not the answer
Sep 15, 2023
Pannick on the laws of London
May 14, 2023
Lewis defends judicial independence
Oct 02, 2022
Did No 10 break the rules?
Dec 08, 2021
Hale receives Israeli PhD
May 25, 2021
Threats to the rule of law
Oct 10, 2020
Enemies of the People?
Aug 26, 2020